This project set out to explore the creative process for visual and non visual people. My first response to this brief was that of apprehension as the notion of differentiating people into two categories of visual and non-visual seemed rather simplistic and patronizing for the latter group. My research led me to look at the possibilities of chance, the different routes people can take to reach the same goal and the different ways to display data for these different groups of people. Finally, I conducted an experiment with 100 people, 50 of whom fell under the stereotypical non-visual category and 50 fell under the category of visual. They each had the task of drawing a line from one corner of a square to another corner with each response marked as either a creative response or a non-creative response.

The data was then analyzed and a poster was constructed to display that outcome. The fundamental flaw that exists with the poster is that it makes no sense unless someone guides you through what the information stands for, a poke at the 'visual' community that graphic design exists to make communication accessible at all levels and not discriminate or single people out as being 'non-visual'.